My introduction to Premium Fraud:
When I first started my job as a Workers Comp Claims
adjuster, I was assigned a very puzzling claim file. First, I noticed the worker’s injury had
occurred a year before the claim was reported to the insurer. Secondly, the worker (let’s call him Bill
Watson) had suffered a nearly catastrophic injury. Bill had been working as a roofer. He was walking with a long pole on his
shoulders with two buckets of hot tar balanced on each end. Bill stumbled and was severely burned over
most of his body when the buckets of hot
tar poured over him.
Bill already had two surgeries before the claim was reported
to the insurer (my employer). Bill’s
employer, the roofing company insured by my carrier, had not reported the
claim. Bill’s attorney had reported it
to us, over a year after the injury.
As a new claims adjuster, I was puzzled—Why had our employer
failed to report this very serious injury?
At the time, I had not heard the term “Premium Fraud” , but I was about
to get some “on the job” training.
I called our policyholder (let’s call them LCS Roofing,
owned by Larry and Cassie Smith) to ask them about the injury. I made several phone calls to the Smiths and
left semi-frantic voice mails.
Later, I received a call from an attorney who said he was
representing Mr. and Ms. Smith. The
attorney said I was to stop calling Mr
and Ms Smith and communicate only with him.
I was flabbergasted. I told the
attorney,I am the assigned claims adjuster for the Smith’s. If they refuse to cooperate with the claims
investigation, we will cancel their policy.
Of course, the attorney replied that the Smiths are not refusing to
cooperate, but they did not want to speak with me directly. This attorney said
the Smith wanted me to deny the claim because Bill Watson was not their
employee.
During the phone call, I finally realized something was
wrong. I called a Senior Payroll Auditor
named Jane and asked her opinion of the situation. I heard Jane gasp on her end of the
line. “The Smith’s have never reported
any payroll for the past ten years they have been insured with us.” Obviously, they had employees. There was Bill Watson. Also, in the emergency room report, they
noted that two co-workers had driven Bill to the ER. So that sounded like three employees, and the
Smith’s had not reported payroll for any of them.
Business owners commit Premium Fraud when they give
misleading information to their workers comp insurer in order to pay a lower
premium amount than they should.
Insurers calculate the premium for the employers based on three primary
factors—their gross amount of payroll, the type of work their employees due (as
defined by the class codes for each profession) and their loss experience.
After speaking with Jane, I understood why the Smiths did
not report Bill’s injury and did not want to speak to me now. They had not reported any payroll, so they
could not admit they had a work who had been injured.
At that point, I contacted our Special Investigation Unit
(SIU) about the claim. An SIU
investigator named Doris was assigned to investigate the situation. Doris worked with Jane in Audit and our Legal
Department to complete the investigation.
Our attorney deposed Bill Watson and got his side of the story:
Bill worked for the Smith’s as a roofer for about two years
before the accident. As Bill was in the
hospital recovering from the burn injury and the first skin graft surgery,
Larry Smith told Bill he had no workers compensation insurance and that Larry
would pay for his medical treatment out of pocket. This was a lie. The Smith’s were insured for workers comp
with my company at the time Bill was injured.
As Bill recovered, Larry Smith paid Bill his regular wages
in addition to the medical costs. After
three months, Bill’s doctors recommended a second skin graft surgery. Larry Smith continued to pay Bill’s wages and
for the medical treatment. After nine
months, Bill’s doctors said he needed a third surgery. At that point, Larry Smith said he could no
longer afford to pay for the wages and medical care and he cut Bill off.
Bill was left on his own, unable to work due to his
continuing pain and unable to pay for the medical treatment he needed. Bill went to an attorney for help. He chose a Personal Injury attorney because
Larry Smith had told him he had no workers comp insurance. However, the PI attorney checked with the
Workers Comp Insurance Rating Bureau and found the Smith’s were insured with my
employer. Then the PI attorney filed the
claim which landed on my desk.
After the deposition of Bill Watson, our in house attorney
recommended we accept Bill’s claim and pay for his third surgery (and all the
other benefits he should have been getting all along).
Doris, the SIU investigator, reported the case to the local
District attorney and Department of Insurance offices. The DA filed felony fraud charges against Mr.
and Ms. Smith. During the DA’s
investigation, they had obtained information from the State Payroll Tax
authority and found the Smith’s had continually reported their employee payroll
taxes to the State and Federal government, even though they had reported no
payroll to their workers comp insurance carrier.
When the DA investigator confronted the Smith’s with this
information, Mr. Smith admitted that he had been advised by an attorney to
report his payroll correctly to the State and Federal government while not
reporting any to the workers comp carrier.
He said he was told, “You don’t want to risk getting caught cheating by
the tax man, but the insurance company probably won’t catch you cheating them”.
This case was the first time I was called to testify for a
Grand Jury. Jane the auditor and Doris
the SIU investigator were called to testify also. The Smith’s entered a guilty plea and agreed
to pay nearly $300,000 in restitution to the insurance carrier for the
insurance premiums they should have been paying for years. Jane the payroll auditor was able to
calculate the amount of premium the Smith’s should have been paying us by using
the payroll numbers they had reported to the State.
I will never forget how Ms. Smith looked as she and her
husband stood before the judge sentenced them.
She seemed to be shaking with anger.
I wondered if she was angry at the judge, the DA’s prosecutor, the
insurance company, or Bill Watson. I
think she was mad at her husband for letting the situation get so far out of
hand.
Bill Watson got his third surgery and back pay for temporary
disability benefits. Later, we gave him
a Stipulated settlement to take care of his future medical needs.
The Smiths were allowed by the judge to pay the restitution
in monthly payments. They also
asked us to give them credit for Bill’s
medical care they had paid for, but we declined.
My lesson learned---If a policyholder tells you a workers
comp claimant is not their employee, take it with a grain of salt. Start asking questions. There is probably
more to the story than they want to tell you.
No comments:
Post a Comment