Provider fraud: The toughest nut to crack
In my early days as an SIU investigator, my dream was to crack
a Provider case, a medical doctor or chiropractor who was cheating the workers
comp system. AS a claims adjuster, I had
experienced frustration with these providers who seemed to employ abusive
practices (and maybe fraudulent practices as well).
Over the years, I learned that Provider fraud is the
toughest kind of workers comp fraud case for law enforcement to prosecute, due
to the complexity of the crimes. Law
enforcement has to call upon multiple insurance companies to provide them with evidence---mostly
medical reports and billing invoices from the providers. Some insurers have technological limitations
in providing the documents, especially in the paperless world of insurance
transactions.
There are intellectual hurdles in these cases as well. How do you draw the line between providers
who use aggressive tactics to collect their insurance billings and bad actors
who try to deceive insurance companies to get paid money they are not entitled
to. Some insurance executives would
rather characterize the bad actors’ attempts as “billing disputes” in order to
avoid the difficulties of fighting this type of fraud. Some in law enforcement will avoid the murky
world of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) billing codes.
My first successful Provider fraud case was a simple one—a
chiropractor billing for services not rendered.
The chiropractor (I’ll call her Susan Brown DC) operated a single office
located in a Southern California beach community. She saw mostly Workers Comp patients (she told
me she preferred WC patients because the insurance companies were required to
pay quickly).
Dr Brown came to my attention when I received a call from one
of our workers comp claimants—I’ll call her Andrea Johnson. Ms. Johnson had injured herself while working
as a physical therapist. She had treated with Dr Brown and knew that Dr Brown
was billing us for more services than she actually provided. I asked Ms. Johnson how she knew what Dr
Brown billed us, because my employer did not send out Explanation of Benefits letters
to the claimants. Ms. Johnson said she
did not want to say anything specific but she was adamant that I investigate Dr
Brown’s reports and billings from other patients, as well.
Excited to have an interesting Provider case, I reviewed all
Dr Brown’s recent billings over multiple workers comp claims. My first approach was to look for an “impossible
day” scenario—Was she billing us for more hours of treatment than she could
possibly render in a single day?
I did not find this scenario. Dr Brown was a relatively small practice with
only six active patients from our insurance company. I did not know how many patients she had from
other carriers, but this “impossible day” scenario did not seem to pan out.
Next, I looked at her billing patterns. I noted every workers comp patient was billed
in the same manner. She billed five CPT codes—one
“active modality” (chiropractic manipulation) and four “passive modalities”—Hot
and cold therapy, mechanical traction, electrical muscle stimulation and ultrasound
therapy.
I thought it was suspicious that every patients’ treatment
was billed the same way. So, I asked another
chiropractor about it—Dr Phillips. She
did Utilization Review for my employer, so I trusted her to give me an honest
opinion.
Dr Phillips reviewed Dr Brown’s billing patterns and told me
the “1 active and 4 passive modalities” pattern was actually allowed by the
Official Medical Fee Schedule. Therefore,
I had hit another dead end.
I contacted one of the claimants, Mr. Jones, to ask him
about the treatment he received from Dr Brown.
He said she was an amazing doctor and how dare I question her patient care.
He got angry with me and hung up.
I decided to investigate outside the billing data. I ran Dr Brown through ISO Claimsearch and
noted Dr Brown had filed a Motor Vehicle Accident injury claim with a different
insurer. Intrigued, I called the auto insurance adjuster. He told me Dr Brown had been involved in an
auto accident nine months prior. He was
handling the claim on behalf of his insured, who was the “at fault” party in
the accident.
Working with the auto adjuster, he was able to provide me
with a copy of part of the insurance claim file. I found that Dr Brown had been deposed three months
prior and had testified to her injuries from the audit accident and she had
been physically unable to perform chiropractic manipulations since the auto
accident.
I reviewed the billing again and found Dr Brown had regularly
billed us for Chiropractic manipulations during the time frame where she
claimed to have been unable to do so.
I circled back to Ms. Johnson and asked if she had received manipulations
from Dr. Brown (or anyone) during the critical time frame. She said she had not seen Dr Brown in the
office at all during that time frame.
She said Dr Brown had an assistant who checked the patients in and
directed them to self-administer the “passive modalities”. She said the clinic was set up like circuit
training and there was an egg timer at each station. The clinic was “self-service”.
I gathered all the billing from the other patients “treated”
during the critical time period. I made
an eFD-1 referral to the local District Attorneys office and the Department of
Insurance. Later, the law enforcement
investigator told me about the search warrant they did at Dr Brown’s large ocean
front home (which had been previously owned
by a famous pop singer). He said
they found Dr Bown in an “intimate moment” with one of her male patients. This patient was Mr. Jones who had hung up on
my a few weeks earlier.
The DA’s office filed Felony insurance fraud charges against
Dr Brown for billing us for services she did not render. At the urging of her defense attorney, she
entered a guilty plea.
I remember overhearing a conversation in the hallway outside
the courtroom before her sentencing. Her
attorney told her, “Now, the judge will want to hear you say your sorry for
what you did…” Dr Brown said, “No
way. I am not apologizing”. And she did not apologize. The Judge ordered her to re-pay $7000 in
restitution, sentenced her to 4 years formal probation and to surrender her
chiro license for 5 years.
My lesson learned from this case was as follows—In Provider
Fraud cases, you have look at all the dimensions—the billing and medical
reports, the licensing and ownership of the Provider, any civil or criminal cases
involving the Provider, Google searches, patient interviews (if possible),
interview former employees of the Provider if you can…
In my experience, there are no hard and fast rules for
conducting Provider investigations—you have to use every resource you can to
get more info on the Provider—Data mining and traditional investigation
approaches.
No comments:
Post a Comment